Focus on Economics, Not Politics
In just a few days we will know the results of the presidential election. No matter what the outcome may be my strong advice is to stay focused on economics rather than politics. The new president and the Congress will have very little wiggle room because of the credit crisis and weak economy. Tax collections are plunging at both federal and state levels. Taxes from capital gains are evaporating. Dividends have been cut. Corporate profits are down. And personal income is down. Based on tax collections in September the federal government is expected to run a deficit of $750 billion this fiscal year. And that may be an optimistic view. Next you add on the $250 billion that is being invested in the banks. That will be treated as an expense this fiscal year. Put the two together and the total federal deficit will most likely be a trillion dollars or 7% of GDP this year. Just the words trillion dollar deficit are likely to be a shocker. I expect there will be public outrage when this news hits the media. Of course there will be demands that the government reduce the deficit. What can the new president and Congress do to reduce this huge deficit; very little. Spending will not go down. It will go up by the amount of any additional fiscal stimulus the Congress and president decide to enact. Raising tax rates in a soft economy makes no sense. First that could do more harm than good. And higher rates do not always mean more taxes collected. The federal government is going to have to hope the Federal Reserve, working with other central banks, will be able to get financial markets functioning again. Fixing the markets and restoring economic growth will take time. And by the time the economic outlook has improved the political landscape may have changed.
Yesterday the Bureau of Economic Analysis or BEA told us that in the third quarter the economy shrank 0.3% in real terms. When I looked at the details I was astounded. In current-dollar terms the economy grew at a 3.8% annual rate in the third quarter. That is down slightly from the 4.1% rate in the second quarter but still much better than the 2.3% rate in the final quarter of last year. What astounded me is that this small change in nominal or current-dollar growth resulted in a huge change in real growth. The BEA said the economy grew 2.8% in the second quarter. How did real growth plunge 3.1% when current dollar growth was down only 0.3%? The implication is that inflation used in the calculation for real growth shot up from 1.3% in the second quarter to 4.1% in the third. Yes oil prices pushed inflation up when they were rising. But oil and many commodity prices peaked in July and are now down. Inflation is moderating. The answer to all this confusion is that the BEA now uses a chained dollar method to determine real growth. This is producing wide swings in real growth. In my opinion watching current dollar growth will be much more useful in determining the best investment strategy. The economy has been in a slow growth condition since the last quarter of 2007. The details from the third quarter say the economy is likely to stay in a slow growth condition with some ups and downs for the next several quarters. Stock markets are priced to anticipate something much worse. This makes stocks the best choice.
